Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Mellon

165 F.2d 80

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1947-12-15
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The appellant was convicted by verdict of a jury upon a charge that on February 20, 1940, he caused an appeal bond to be furnished on behalf of Michael Pecoraro, named as principal in the bond, and caused some person to forge the signature of “Charles D. Martineau” who was named as surety in the bond. “Charles D. Martineau” was a name used by George LaFante, and in that name LaFante held title to real estate jointly purchased by him and the appellant. LaFante testified that he had neither signed the bond nor authorized anyone to sign it.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Mellon. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
UNITED STATES v. MELLON,165 F.2d 80(2nd Cir. 1947)
UNITED STATES v. MELLON et al.
No. 94, Docket 20767.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
December 15, 1947.
Page 81
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

John Mellon was convicted of having caused an appeal bond to be furnished on behalf of one named as principal in the bond and caused some person to forge signature of one who was named as surety in the bond in violation of Criminal Code, § 28, 18 U.S.C.A. § 72, and he appeals.

Affirmed.
Louis Halle, of New York City, for appellant.

J. Vincent Keogh, U.S. Atty., of Brooklyn (Mario Pittoni, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Brooklyn, of counsel), for appellee.
Before SWAN, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was convicted by verdict of a jury upon a charge that on February 20, 1940, he caused an appeal bond to be furnished on behalf of Michael Pecoraro, named as principal in the bond, and caused some person to forge the signature of "Charles D. Martineau" who was named as surety in the bond. "Charles D. Martineau" was a name used by George LaFante, and in that name LaFante held title to real estate jointly purchased by him and the appellant. LaFante testified that he had neither signed the bond nor authorized anyone to sign it. When the bond was executed on February 20, 1940 the appellant was in jail under an arrest made on February 13th. Proof of his guilt in respect to the bond rests upon an oral confession made by him in December 1944 to Ralph Lewis, an F.B.I. agent, who testified as to what the appellant then told him. The appellant took the stand and denied having made the confession but the jury found against him.

It is urged that the conviction must be set aside because the confession is uncorroborated. Warszower v. United States,312 U.S. 342, 345, 61 S.Ct. 603, 85 L.Ed. 876; Daeche v. United States, 2 Cir., 250 F. 566, 571. But corroboration is found both in LaFante's denial that he signed or authorized anyone to sign the bond, and in the fact that the appellant was not jailed until February 13th and therefore had opportunity to arrange before that date to have the bond furnished thereafter, as his confession stated he had done. We think the corroboration sufficient. United States v. Kertess, 2 Cir.,139 F.2d 923, certiorari denied Kertess v. United States,321 U.S. 795, 64 S. Ct. 847, 88 L.Ed. 1084.

The judgment is affirmed.