Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Commers v. United States

Commers v. United States, 159 F.2d 248 (9th Cir. 1947)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1947-01-16
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the transcript of record briefs filed by respective parties, and oral arguments, ordered judgment of the District Court, 66 F.Supp. 943, affirmed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate issue as provided in Rule.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Commers v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
4 opinions
COMMERS v. UNITED STATES,159 F.2d 248(9th Cir. 1947)
Edward C. COMMERS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 11404.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
January 16, 1947.
Writ of Certiorari Denied April 14, 1947.
See 67 S.Ct. 1189.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana; R. Lewis Brown, Judge.
John W. Mahan and Charles E. Pew, both of Helena, Mont. for appellant.

John B. Tansil, U.S. Attorney, of Billings, Mont., Francis J. McGan, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of Butte, Mont., John F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Searcy L. Johnson, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and D. Vance Swann and Thomas E. Walsh, Attys., Dept. of Justice, both of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the transcript of record briefs filed by respective parties, and oral arguments, ordered judgment of the District Court,66 F. Supp. 943, affirmed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate issue as provided in Rule.Page 278