Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Strom v. Commissioner

158 F.2d 520

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1947-01-16
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in its opinion (6 T.C. 621), the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Strom v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

STROM v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,158 F.2d 520(9th Cir. 1947)

Charles STROM and Flora Strom, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 11383.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 16, 1947.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

L.L. Thompson and L.B. Donley, both of Tacoma, Wash., for petitioner.

Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch, Carlton Fox, and Newton Fox, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS, and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in its opinion (6 T.C. 621), the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.Page 568