Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES, 155 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1946)

Jullo RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. United States, Appellee., 155 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1946)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1946-06-14
Topic: general

RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES, 155 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1946) Jullo RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 11022.Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 14, 1946.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES, 155 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1946). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES,155 F.2d 725(9th Cir. 1946)

Jullo RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 11022.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 14, 1946.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Louis E. Goodman, Judge.

Andersen Resner and Herbert Resner, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., James W. Knapp and Roscoe T. Pile, Attys., Dept. of Justice, both of Washington, D.C., and Frank J. Hennessy, U.S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.Page 726