Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Standish v. Commissioner

154 F.2d 1022

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1946-03-26
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States, 4 T.C. 995, in above cause may be affirmed, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States in the above causes be affirmed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Standish v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

STANDISH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,154 F.2d 1022(9th Cir. 1946)

A.M. STANDISH, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent. Beatrice M. STANDISH, Petitioner, v. SAME.

No. 11159.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 26, 1946.

Upon Petitions to Review Decisions of the Tax Court of the United States.

R. Clarence Ogden, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners.

Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Division, and J. Louis Monarch and John F. Costelloe, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

Before GARRECHT, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States,4 T.C. 995, in above cause may be affirmed, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States in the above causes be affirmed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.Page 1023