Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Geller v. TRANS-AMERICA CORPORATION

151 F.2d 534

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1945-11-09
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The questions involved in this appeal were fully discussed by Judge Leahy in his opinion filed in the District Court, 53 F.Supp. 625. We find ourselves in entire agreement with his reasoning and conclusions and have nothing to add thereto. Accordingly the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Geller v. TRANS-AMERICA CORPORATION. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

GELLER v. TRANS-AMERICA CORPORATION,151 F.2d 534(3rd Cir. 1945)

J. Lewis GELLER, Appellant, v. TRANS-AMERICA CORPORATION.

No. 8632.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued November 8, 1945.

Decided November 9, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware; Paul Leahy, Judge.Page 535

Daniel O. Hastings, of Wilmington, Del. (John Van Brunt, Jr., of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel Marion, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Edwin D. Steel, Jr., of Wilmington, Del. (Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The questions involved in this appeal were fully discussed by Judge Leahy in his opinion filed in the District Court,53 F. Supp. 625. We find ourselves in entire agreement with his reasoning and conclusions and have nothing to add thereto. Accordingly the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.