Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Nevins, Inc. v. Rothensies

151 F.2d 189

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1945-10-10
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. For the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kirkpatrick, 58 F.Supp. 460, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nevins, Inc. v. Rothensies. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

NEVINS INC. v. ROTHENSIES,151 F.2d 189(3rd Cir. 1945)

NEVINS, Inc., v. Walter J. ROTHENSIES, Collector of Internal Revenue for

the First District of Pennsylvania, Appellant.

No. 8895.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued October 8, 1945.

Decided October 10, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.

Robert R. Reynolds, Jr., of Washington, D.C. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and A.F. Prescott, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Gleeson, U.S. Atty., and Thomas J. Curtin, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent.

Morris Wolf, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Wolf, Block, Schorr Solis-Cohen, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kirkpatrick,58 F. Supp. 460, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.Page 190