Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

In re St. Charles Hotel Co.

149 F.2d 645

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1945-06-13
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The orders of the District Court, the first of which was entered on March 26, 1945 and the remaining two on April 30, 1945, are affirmed for the reasons set forth in the excellent opinion of Judge Forman, 60 F.Supp. 322.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re St. Charles Hotel Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
4 opinions
MATTER OF ST. CHARLES HOTEL,149 F.2d 645(3rd Cir. 1945)
In the Matter of ST. CHARLES HOTEL Co., Debtor, Edward S. Ladin,
appellant.
No. 8937.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued June 9, 1945.
Decided June 13, 1945.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Phillip Forman, Judge.
David M. Palley, of New York City (Annetta Brof-Quinn, of Jersey City, N.J., on the brief), for appellant.

George Zolotar, of New York City (Roger S. Foster, Sol., of Philadelphia, Pa., and Richard V. Bandler, of New York City, on the brief), for Securities and Exchange Commission.

Charles Gottlieb, of New York City (Thomas H. Munyan, of Atlantic City, N.J., on the brief), for appellees.

I. Emanuel Sauder, of Philadelphia, Pa., for amici curiae.
Before MARTIN and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges, and KALODNER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The orders of the District Court, the first of which was entered on March 26, 1945 and the remaining two on April 30, 1945, are affirmed for the reasons set forth in the excellent opinion of Judge Forman,60 F. Supp. 322.Page 646