Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Setser v. United States

147 F.2d 158

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1945-02-05
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. A careful examination of the record discloses no reversible error, and the judgment is, therefore, Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Setser v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

SETSER v. UNITED STATES,147 F.2d 158(D.C. Cir. 1945)

Herman A. SETSER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Marion

J. SMITH, Appellant, v. SAME.

Nos. 8807, 8808.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued January 17, 1945.

Decided February 5, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Mr. John T. Bonner, of Washington, D.C. (appointed by District Court), for appellants.

Mr. Charles B. Murray, Assistant United States Attorney, of Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Edward M. Curran, United States Attorney, and T. Peter Ansberry, Assistant United States Attorney, both of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the record discloses no reversible error, and the judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.Page 159