Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Zeitz v. Maggio

145 F.2d 241

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1944-10-25
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Robbins v. Gottbetter, 2 Cir., 134 F.2d 843, and Cohen v. Jeskowitz, 2 Cir., 144 F.2d 39.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Zeitz v. Maggio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

ZEITZ v. MAGGIO,145 F.2d 241(2nd Cir. 1944)

Raymond ZEITZ, Trustee, Appellee, v. Joseph F. MAGGIO, Appellant.

No. 51.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

October 25, 1944.

Writ of Certiorari Denied February 5, 1945.

See 65 S.Ct. 587.

Appeal from an order in bankruptcy of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (In re Luma Camera Service, Inc.,57 F. Supp. 632), affirming the order of a referee, directing the bankrupt's president to pay over to the trustee $17,500.

Duberstein Schwartz, of Brooklyn, N.Y. (Max Schwartz and Samuel C. Duberstein, both of Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for appellant.

Samuel Bader, Glass Lynch, and Benjamin Wicksel, all of New York City (Leslie Kirsch, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Robbins v. Gottbetter, 2 Cir.,134 F.2d 843, and Cohen v. Jeskowitz, 2 Cir.,144 F.2d 39.Page 242