Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Keilbar v. United States

Keilbar v. United States, 144 F.2d 866 (5th Cir. 1944)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1944-10-02
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. In the above entitled and numbered cause comes the appellant, by his counsel, E. M. Grimes, Esq., and the appellee by its counsel, W. R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Keilbar v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
8 opinions
KEILBAR v. UNITED STATES,144 F.2d 866(5th Cir. 1944)
Max Hermann KEILBAR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 11140.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 2, 1944.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas; Walter A. Keeling, Judge.
E.M. Grimes, of Taylor, Tex., for appellant.

W.R. Smith, Jr., U.S. Atty., and J.M. Burnett, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Antonio, Tex., for appellee.
Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In the above entitled and numbered cause comes the appellant, by his counsel, E.M. Grimes, Esq., and the appellee by its counsel, W.R. Smith, Jr., Esq., United States Attorney, and J.M. Burnett, Esq., Assistant United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas, and files a joint stipulation that judgment of this Court be entered reversing the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in the above entitled and numbered cause, and remanding said cause to the said District Court with instructions to dismiss the complaint on its merits;

Pursuant to said stipulation, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court, that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be, and it is hereby, reversed, and that said cause be, and it is hereby, remanded to the said District Court with instructions to dismiss the complaint on its merits.

It is further ordered that the mandate of this Court shall issue forthwith.Page 867