Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

KAUZ v. UNITED STATES, 135 F.2d 464 (5th Cir. 1943)

Sue D. KAUZ, Appellant, v. United States, Appellee., 135 F.2d 464 (5th Cir. 1943)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1943-05-05
Topic: general

KAUZ v. UNITED STATES, 135 F.2d 464 (5th Cir. 1943) Sue D. KAUZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 10424.Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed KAUZ v. UNITED STATES, 135 F.2d 464 (5th Cir. 1943). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

KAUZ v. UNITED STATES,135 F.2d 464(5th Cir. 1943)

Sue D. KAUZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 10424.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 5, 1943.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; John W. Holland, Judge.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

Edwin H. Grace, of New Orleans, La., and Allen Clements, of Miami, Fla., for appellant.

H.S. Phillips, U.S. Atty., of Tampa, Fla., and Ernest L. Duhaime, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Miami, Fla., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A careful examination of the record disclosing no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.Page 464