Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Fletcher v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.

Fletcher v. Evening Star Newspaper Co., 133 F.2d 395 (Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit 1942)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1942-12-31
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • permitting the court to take judicial notice of opinions involving “the same subject matter or questions of a related nature between the same parties”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fletcher v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
44 opinions
FLETCHER v. EVENING STAR NEWSPAPER CO.,133 F.2d 395(D.C. Cir. 1942)
FLETCHER v. EVENING STAR NEWSPAPER CO.
No. 8140.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued November 18, 1942.
Decided December 31, 1942.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Action between Edmond C. Fletcher and the Evening Star Newspaper Company. From an adverse judgment, the former appeals.

Affirmed.
Mr. Edmond C. Fletcher, pro se, of Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Edmund L. Jones, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before EICHER, C.J., and GOLDSBOROUGH and McGUIRE, JJ., all of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM.
The controlling question raised on this appeal is whether a lower court, on a motion made for summary judgment, and in determining that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, can take judicial notice of its own records in concluding the issue thus raised.

We take this to be too well settled to be seriously questioned. United States v. California Co-op. Canneries,279 U.S. 553,49 S.Ct. 423,73 L.Ed. 838; McDonough v. Owl Drug Company, 9 Cir.,75 F.2d 45, certiorari denied,295 U.S. 750,55 S.Ct. 829,79 L.Ed. 1694; United States v. North American Oil Consolidated, 9 Cir.,264 F. 336, affirming D.C. 1917, 242 F. 723, appeal dismissed 1922,258 U.S. 633,42 S.Ct. 315,66 L.Ed. 802; Freshman v. Atkins,269 U.S. 121,46 S.Ct. 41,70 L.Ed. 193; Booth v. Fletcher,69 App.D.C. 351,101 F.2d 676, certiorari denied307 U.S. 628,59 S.Ct. 835,83 L.Ed. 1511; Suren v. Oceanic S.S. Co., 9 Cir.,85 F.2d 324, certiorari denied300 U.S. 653,57 S.Ct. 430,81 L.Ed. 863.

Not only that, but it is settled law that the court may take judicial notice of other cases including the same subject matter or questions of a related nature between the same parties. United States v. North American Oil Consolidated, supra; Sunkist Drinks, Inc., v. Calif. Fruit Growers Exchange, D.C.,25 F. Supp. 400; Freshman v. Atkins, supra; Booth v. Fletcher, supra;Page 396Kithcart v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir.,88 F.2d 407; National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Thompson,281 U.S. 331,50 S.Ct. 288,74 L.Ed. 881.

Nor is there anything in the contention that a motion for summary judgment must be accompanied by supporting affidavits. (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule56, U.S.C.A. Tit. 28, following Section 723c.) The Rule does not make such mandatory. Reynolds v. Needle, ___ U.S.App.D.C. ___,132 F.2d 161, decided Dec. 14, 1942.

There being no reversible error, it follows, therefore, that the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.Page 397