Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

FIDELITY DEPOSIT COMPANY v. GASTON, 13 F.2d 268 (2nd Cir. 1926)

Fid. DEPOSIT Co. OF Md. et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.GASTON, WILLIAMS WIGMORE, Inc., Defendant-Appellee., 13 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1926)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1926-06-17
Topic: general

FIDELITY DEPOSIT COMPANY v. GASTON, 13 F.2d 268 (2nd Cir. 1926) FIDELITY DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.GASTON, WILLIAMS WIGMORE, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 387.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. June 17, 1926. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed FIDELITY DEPOSIT COMPANY v. GASTON, 13 F.2d 268 (2nd Cir. 1926). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

FIDELITY DEPOSIT COMPANY v. GASTON,13 F.2d 268(2nd Cir. 1926)

FIDELITY DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

GASTON, WILLIAMS WIGMORE, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 387.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 17, 1926.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Kaye, McDavitt Scholer, of New York City (Albert Falck and Harold L. Fierman, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Cadwalader, Wickersham Taft, of New York City (Edwin P. Grosvenor and Catherine C. Noyes, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree (13 F.[2d] 267) affirmed, with costs.Page 269