Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Pulfer v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Pulfer v. Comm’r OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 128 F.2d 742 (6th Cir. 1942)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1942-05-13
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel; upon consideration whereof, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Board promulgated February 19, 1941. 43 B. T. A. 677.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pulfer v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
PULFER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,128 F.2d 742(6th Cir. 1942)
Robert A. PULFER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent.
No. 9057.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 13, 1942.
Appeal from the United States Board of Tax Appeals.
William A. Borrusch, of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Sewall Key, J.P. Wenchel, John M. Morawski, J. Louis Monarch, and Samuel H. Levy, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel; upon consideration whereof, the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Board promulgated February 19, 1941.43 B.T.A. 677.Page 744