Opinion · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Merryfield v. F. M. Hoyt Shoe Corp.

Merryfield v. F. M. Hoyt Shoe Corp., 128 F.2d 452 (1st Cir. 1942)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1942-06-03
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. Upon the authority of Kirschbaum v. Walling (Arsenal Building Corporation v. Walling), 62 S.Ct. 1116, 86 L.Ed. -, decided by the United States Supreme Court June 1, 1942, the judgment of the District Court is reversed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Merryfield v. F. M. Hoyt Shoe Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

MERRYFIELD v. F.M. HOYT SHOE CORPORATION,128 F.2d 452(1st Cir. 1942)

Charles H. MERRYFIELD et al. v. F.M. HOYT SHOE CORPORATION et al.

No. 3746.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

June 3, 1942.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Hampshire; George F. Morris, Judge.

Omer H. Amyot, of Manchester, N.H., for appellants.

John E. Tobin, of Manchester, N.H., for F.M. Hoyt Shoe Corporation, appellee.

George W. Crockett, Jr., and Warner W. Gardner, Sol., Mortimer B. Wolf, Asst. Sol., and Vernon Stoneman, Regional Atty., U.S. Department of Labor, all of Washington, D.C. (Jacob D. Hyman and Joseph L. Breen, both of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Wage and Hour Division, as amicus curiae.

Before MAHONEY and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges, and SWEENEY, District Judge, sitting.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of Kirschbaum v. Walling (Arsenal Building Corporation v. Walling),62 S.Ct. 1116, 86 L.Ed. ___, decided by the United States Supreme Court June 1, 1942, the judgment of the District Court is reversed.Page 453Page 473