Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Nieschlag & Co. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

126 F.2d 834

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1942-02-14
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Judgment, 43 F.Supp. 797, affirmed on opinion below.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nieschlag & Co. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

NIESCHLAG CO. v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INS. CO.,126 F.2d 834(2nd Cir. 1942)

NIESCHLAG CO., Inc., Appellant, v. ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 181.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 14, 1942.

Appeal from a summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dismissing a complaint for insurance.

Harold T. Edwards and Edwards Smith, all of New York, City (Edwin W. Patterson and Charles A. Ellis, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

J.M. Richardson Lyeth and Maclay, Lyeth Williams, all of New York City (Mark W. Maclay and Robert L. Fay, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Gustave Simons, of New York City, (Theodore E. Wolcott, of New York City, of counsel), for Curacao Trading Co. Inc., amicus curiae.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment,43 F. Supp. 797, affirmed on opinion below.