Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Calafato v. Commissioner

124 F.2d 187

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1941-12-03
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals, 42 B.T.A. 881, are affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Calafato v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 1 opinion

CALAFATO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,124 F.2d 187(3rd Cir. 1941)

Joseph CALAFATO and Mrs. Lena Calafato, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF

INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Joseph CALAFATO and Lena Calafato, his wife,

Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Nos. 7751, 7752.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued December 3, 1941.

Decided December 3, 1941.

On Petitions for Review of the Decisions of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

John A. McCann, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioners.

Warren F. Wattles, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Gerald L. Wallace, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, MARIS, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals, 42 B.T.A. 881, are affirmed.