Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
United States ex rel. Coy v. United States
124 F.2d 1019
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1942-01-16
- Topic
- litigation
PER CURIAM. This cause was submitted to the court upon briefs of counsel and without oral argument, and on consideration whereof, it is ordered .and adjudged that the order of the District Court, 38 F.Supp. 610, dismissing appellant’s petition to correct the sentence and judgment entered against him by the District Court on June 3, 1937, for lack of jurisdiction to entertain it, is in all things affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the District Judge filed May 9, 1941.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States ex rel. Coy v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES,124 F.2d 1019(6th Cir. 1942)
UNITED STATES ex rel. Bernard Paul COY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED
STATES, and Its Authorized Representative, the Honorable Shackelford
Miller, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District
of Kentucky at Owensboro, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 9093.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
January 16, 1942.
Eli H. Brown, III, of Louisville, Ky., for appellee.
Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.