Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Vennell v. United States

122 F.2d 936

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1941-10-13
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the opinions of Judge Bard, 36 F.Supp. 646 and 38 F.Supp. 381.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vennell v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

VENNELL v. UNITED STATES,122 F.2d 936(3rd Cir. 1941)

Leroy L. VENNELL, Adm'r, etc., Estate of Paul B. Adamson, Deceased,

Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 7747.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued October 10, 1941.

Decided October 13, 1941.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Guy K. Bard, Judge.

Lewis H. VanDusen, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa. (Drinker, Biddle Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Carl J. Marold, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Louis Monarch and Frederic G. Rita, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Gerald A. Gleeson, U.S. Atty., and Thomas J. Curtin, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the opinions of Judge Bard,36 F. Supp. 646and38 F. Supp. 381.Page 937