Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Piccard v. Sperry Corp.

120 F.2d 328

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1941-06-05
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Order, 36 F.Supp. 1006, affirmed in open court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Piccard v. Sperry Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

PICCARD v. SPERRY CORPORATION,120 F.2d 328(2nd Cir. 1941)

Jules E. PICCARD, on behalf of himself and for the benefit of and on

behalf of the defendant, The Sperry Corporation, and all other

stockholders of said defendant, The Sperry Corporation, who may be

similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPERRY CORPORATION et al.,

Defendants-Appellees, Consolidated Investing Corporation, Appellant.

No. 318.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 5, 1941.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Weinstein Levinson, of New York City (Frank Weinstein and Samuel J. Levinson, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Consolidated Investing Corporation.

A. Joseph Geist, of New York City (George E. Netter, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Jules E. Piccard.

Chadbourne, Wallace, Parke Whiteside, of New York City, for defendants Sperry Corporation and others.

Sullivan Cromwell, of New York City, for defendant J. Russell Forgan and others.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order,36 F. Supp. 1006, affirmed in open court.