Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Cantey v. McLain Line, Inc.

Cantey v. McLain Line, Inc., 114 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1940)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1940-10-28
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Decree, 32 F.Supp. 1023, affirmed on the authority of Diomede v. Lowe, 2 Cir., 87 F.2d 296.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cantey v. McLain Line, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
5 opinions
CANTEY v. McLAIN LINE,114 F.2d 1017(2nd Cir. 1940)
William CANTEY, Appellant, v. McLAIN LINE, Inc., and McLain Carolina Line,
Inc., Appellees.
No. 32.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 28, 1940.
On Appeal from a decree in admiralty of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Paul C. Matthews, of New York City, for appellant.

Charles F. Welch, of New York City, for appellees.
Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Decree,32 F. Supp. 1023, affirmed on the authority of Diomede v. Lowe, 2 Cir.,87 F.2d 296.