Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

JAHNCKE SERVICE v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 112 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1933)

JAHNCKE Serv., Inc., Petitioner, v. Comm’r OF INTERNALREVENUE, Respondent., 112 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1933)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1933-02-10
Topic: general

JAHNCKE SERVICE v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 112 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1933) JAHNCKE SERVICE, Incorporated, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNALREVENUE, Respondent. No. 6508.Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed JAHNCKE SERVICE v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 112 F.2d 169 (5th Cir. 1933). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

JAHNCKE SERVICE v. COMMR. OF INTERNAL REVENUE,112 F.2d 169(5th Cir. 1933)

JAHNCKE SERVICE, Incorporated, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 6508.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 10, 1933.

Petition for Review of Decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

John J. Finnorn, of New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

Andrew D. Sharpe, and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., G.A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C.M. Charest, General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and John D. Foley, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion of counsel for petitioner, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be, and it is hereby, dismissed, at the cost of the Petitioner.Page 169