Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Sachs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Sachs v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 111 F.2d 648 (6th Cir. 1940)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1940-04-03
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record and briefs and argument of counsel, on consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that the decision reviewed be and the same is in all things affirmed for the reasons and upon the grounds stated in the opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals filed June 15, 1937.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sachs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
SACHS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,111 F.2d 648(6th Cir. 1940)
Alfred H. SACHS, Estelle D. Sachs, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF
INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 8061.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 3, 1940.
On Petition to Review the Decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.
Alfred H. Sachs, of Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioners.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., J.P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, T.M. Mather, Paul A. Sebastian, and Lee A. Jackson, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before HICKS, HAMILTON, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record and briefs and argument of counsel, on consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that the decision reviewed be and the same is in all things affirmed for the reasons and upon the grounds stated in the opinion of the Board of Tax Appeals filed June 15, 1937.Page 649