Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Robertson v. United States

Robertson v. United States, 111 F.2d 1018 (6th Cir. 1940)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1940-04-10
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM. This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript, briefs, and arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the testimony of an accomplice need not be corroborated to support a conviction [Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470, 495, 37 S.Ct. 192, 61 L.Ed. 442, L.R.A. 1917F, 502, Ann.Cas.1917B, 1168; Nibbelink v. United States, 6 Cir., 73 F.2d 677, 678; United States v. Muraskin, 2 Cir., 99 F.2d 815], and that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is hereby affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Robertson v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES,111 F.2d 1018(6th Cir. 1940)
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES.
No. 8286.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 10, 1940.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Edward J. Moinet, Judge.

Proceeding between Corwin P. Robertson, alias Charles P. Roberts, and the United States of America. From an adverse judgment, the former appeals.

Affirmed.
Donald B. Frederick, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

John C. Lehr, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before ALLEN, HAMILTON, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript, briefs, and arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the testimony of an accomplice need not be corroborated to support a conviction [Caminetti v. United States,242 U.S. 470,495,37 S.Ct. 192,61 L.Ed. 442, L.R.A. 1917F, 502, Ann.Cas. 1917B, 1168; Nibbelink v. United States, 6 Cir.,73 F.2d 677,678; United States v. Muraskin, 2 Cir.,99 F.2d 815], and that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is hereby affirmed.Page 72