Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Motorship the Ferncliff & Glittre Aktieselskabet & Fearnley & Eger

105 F.2d 1021

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1939-04-28
Topic: international-arbitration

PER CURIAM. Decree of District Court, The Fern-cliff, 22 F.Supp. 728, affirmed. Costs divided. Decree filed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Smith v. Motorship the Ferncliff & Glittre Aktieselskabet & Fearnley & Eger. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

SMITH v. THE FERNCLIFF,105 F.2d 1021(4th Cir. 1939)

H.V.B. SMITH, C.D. Rafferty and H.S. McCormick, Co-Partners Trading and

Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of H.J. Baker Bro.,

Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. Motorship THE FERNCLIFF and Glittre

Aktieselskabet and Fearnley Eger, Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

No. 4385.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

April 28, 1939.

Cross-appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; W. Calvin Chesnut, Judge.

Charles R. Hickox, of New York City, and George W.P. Whip, of Baltimore, Md., for appellants and cross-appellees.

George Whitefield Betts, Jr., of New York City, and George Forbes and Henry L. Wortche, both of Baltimore, Md., for appellees and cross-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

Decree of District Court, The Ferncliff,22 F. Supp. 728, affirmed. Costs divided. Decree filed.Page 1022