Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Gilman v. United States

294 F. 422

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1924-02-08
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM. First indicating that no question of the jurisdiction of the District Court under the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505) has been raised or decided, we affirm the judgment of that court on the opinion of the learned trial judge (290 Fed. 614), later fortified by the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Helmholz v. Horst, 294 Fed. 417, affirming Horst v. United States (D. C.) 283 Fed. 600.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gilman v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
PER CURIAM.

First indicating that no question of the jurisdiction of the District Court under the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505) has been raised or decided, we affirm the judgment of that court on the opinion of the learned trial judge (290 Fed. 614), later fortified by the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Helmholz v. Horst, 294 Fed. 417, affirming Horst v. United States (D. C.) 283 Fed. 600.