Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

COFFIN v. HARRIS-WOODBURY LUMBER CO., 187 F. 1005 (4th Cir. 6-14-1911)

COFFIN v. HARRIS-WOODBURY LUMBER CO., 187 F. 1005 (4th Cir. 1911)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1911-06-14
Topic
general

COFFIN v. HARRIS-WOODBURY LUMBER CO., 187 F. 1005 (4th Cir. 6-14-1911) COFFIN et al. v. HARRIS-WOODBURY LUMBER CO. No. 1,013.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. June 14, 1911.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed COFFIN v. HARRIS-WOODBURY LUMBER CO., 187 F. 1005 (4th Cir. 6-14-1911). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

COFFIN v. HARRIS-WOODBURY LUMBER CO.,187 F. 1005(4th Cir. 6-14-1911)
COFFIN et al. v. HARRIS-WOODBURY LUMBER CO.
No. 1,013.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 14, 1911.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville.
Allan D. Cole (William P. Bynum, R. C. Strudwick, and E. J. Justice, on the brief), for appellants.

James H. Merrimon and Coleman C. Cowan, for appellee.
Before GOFF, Circuit Judge, and WADDILL and ROSE, District Judges.
MEMORANDUM DECISIONS
PER CURIAM.
In the court below this case was referred to a special master by an order entered with the consent of the parties. The master heard the evidence, found the facts, and applied the law applicable thereto. His report, with the exceptions filed by the defendants below to the same, were duly considered, the latter found to be without merit, the former being confirmed.179 Fed. 257. We have simply to determine whether the said report, on which the decree appealed from is based, was supported by the evidence taken by the master, whose conclusions, approved of by the court below, will not be set aside, unless it plainly appears that a mistake was made in the consideration of the evidence. Our examination of the record satisfies us that the report made by the master was fully justified by the evidence, and that the decree of the court below is without error. Affirmed.Page 260