Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Meigs v. London Assur. Co.
68 C.C.A. 249
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1905-02-03
- Topic
- general
DALLAS, Circuit Judge. The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an-opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 Fed. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Meigs v. London Assur. Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
The able argument which has been submitted on behalf of the plaintiff in error has had our careful attention, but it has failed to convince us that any error was committed by the Circuit Court in its decision of this case. The learned judge carefully considered it in an-opinion which, we think, completely vindicated his conclusion. 126 Fed. 781. Upon that opinion, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.