Opinion · District Court, D. Montana
Campbell v. Montana State Board of Pardons
Campbell v. Mont. State Bd. of Pardons, 470 F. Supp. 1301 (District Court, D. Montana 1979)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- District Court, D. Montana
- Jurisdiction
- Montana
- Date
- 1979-06-25
- Topic
- labor-and-employment
OPINION AND ORDER RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge. The petition for leave to appear in forma pauperis is denied on the ground that the petition is frivolous. In Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Pena] and Correctional Complex, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2100, 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979), the Supreme Court held that, unless a parole statute creates a legitimate entitlement to parole, there is no requirement of due process protection.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Campbell v. Montana State Board of Pardons. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
OPINION AND ORDER
RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.The petition for leave to appear in forma pauperis is denied on the ground that the petition is frivolous. In Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Pena] and Correctional Complex, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2100, 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979), the Supreme Court held that, unless a parole statute creates a legitimate entitlement to parole, there is no requirement of due process protection. A mere hope is insufficient. The language of the Montana statute 1 does not in my opinion create an entitlement. Whether or not parole is granted is dependent entirely on the discretion of the parole board.
. “Subject to the following restrictions, the board shall release on parole by appropriate order any person confined in the Montana state prison, except persons under sentence of death and persons serving sentences imposed under 46- 18 202(2), when in its opinion there is reasonable probability that the prisoner can be released without detriment to himself or to the community.” Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-201(1) (1978).