Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Tesciona v. Johnston

Tesciona v. Johnston, 81 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1936-03-27
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Upon consideration oL the record and brief filed, and by direction of the court, ordered, order of District Court affirmed, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly; mandate to issue in thirty days.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tesciona v. Johnston. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

TESCIONA v. JOHNSTON,81 F.2d 1022(9th Cir. 1936)

Frank TESCIONA, Appellant, v. James A. JOHNSTON, Warden, U.S.

Penitentiary, Alcatraz, Cal., Appellee.

No. 8101.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 27, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Harold Louderback, Judge.

Frank Tesciona, in pro. per.

H.H. McPike, U.S. Atty., and A.J. Zirpoli, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record and brief filed, and by direction of the court, ordered, order of District Court affirmed, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly; mandate to issue in thirty days.Page 1023