Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Wiren v. Shubert Theatre Corp.

Wiren v. Shubert Theatre Corp., 70 F.2d 1023 (2d Cir. 1934)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1934-05-21
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Order (5 F. Supp. 358) affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wiren v. Shubert Theatre Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

WIREN v. SHUBERT THEATRE CORPORATION,70 F.2d 1023(2nd Cir. 1934)

Myra Page WIREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHUBERT THEATRE CORPORATION,

Shubert Theatrical Co., Inc., Lee Shubert, Samuel French, Incorporated,

Samuel French, Ltd., J.B. Pinker Son., Inc., Alberto Casella, Walter

Ferris, Berta Cuttl, Philip Merivale, United Artists Corporation, and

Paramount Famous Lasky Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 430.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 21, 1934.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Oscar B. Wiren, of New York City, for appellant.

Austin C. Keough, of New York City (Louis Phillips and Irving Cohen, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Paramount Publix Corporation sued herein as Paramount Famous Lasky Corporation.

William Klein, of New York City (William Klein, Milton R. Weinberger, and Stanley S. Joseloff, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Shubert Theatre Corporation, Shubert Theatrical Co., Inc., Lee Shubert, J.B. Pinker Son, Inc., and Walter Ferris.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order (5 F. Supp. 358) affirmed.Page 1Page 1