Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. G. Wilkenfeld & Co.

United States v. G. Wilkenfeld & Co., 46 F.2d 464 (2d Cir. 1930)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1930-12-01
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. Judgment [46 F.(2d) 462] affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. G. Wilkenfeld & Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

UNITED STATES v. WILKENFELD CO.,46 F.2d 464(2nd Cir. 1930)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. G. WILKENFELD CO., Inc., Abner B.

Taub, Jacob Taub, and Gustave Wilkenfeld, Appellants, Abraham Kelmanson,

Roman Pajewski, Anthony Torre, Matteo Yovino, Meyer Zelickman, Anthony

Cavarlier, Morris Solomon, Vito Gaeta, John Lepora, Harry Lepora and John

Manno, Defendants.

No. 175.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 1, 1930.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Harold L. Turk, of Brooklyn, N.Y., and Samuel Rosenmeier, for appellants.

Herbert H. Kellogg, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for the United States.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment [46 F.2d 462] affirmed.