Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

AMERICAN CAN COMPANY v. GOLDEE MFG. COMPANY, 31 F.2d 494 (2nd Cir. 1929)

Am. CAN Co., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOLDEE MANUFACTURINGCOMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee., 31 F.2d 494 (2d Cir. 1929)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1929-03-04
Topic: general

AMERICAN CAN COMPANY v. GOLDEE MFG. COMPANY, 31 F.2d 494 (2nd Cir. 1929) AMERICAN CAN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOLDEE MANUFACTURINGCOMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 226.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed AMERICAN CAN COMPANY v. GOLDEE MFG. COMPANY, 31 F.2d 494 (2nd Cir. 1929). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

AMERICAN CAN COMPANY v. GOLDEE MFG. COMPANY,31 F.2d 494(2nd Cir. 1929)

AMERICAN CAN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOLDEE MANUFACTURING

COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 226.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 4, 1929.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Affirming decree31 F.2d 492. See, also (D.C.) 290 F. 523.

Lemuel A. Welles, of New York City (John C. Carpenter, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant.

Mock Blum, of New York City, for appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed, with costs.