Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

ARMOUR GRAIN v. COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANS., 26 F.2d 741 (2nd Cir. 1928)

ARMOUR GRAIN Co., Appellee, v. COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANSAT-LANTIQUE,Appellant., 26 F.2d 741 (2d Cir. 1928)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1928-05-07
Topic: general

ARMOUR GRAIN v. COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANS., 26 F.2d 741 (2nd Cir. 1928) ARMOUR GRAIN COMPANY, Appellee, v. COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANSAT-LANTIQUE,Appellant. No. 273.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 7, 1928.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed ARMOUR GRAIN v. COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANS., 26 F.2d 741 (2nd Cir. 1928). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

ARMOUR GRAIN v. COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANS.,26 F.2d 741(2nd Cir. 1928)

ARMOUR GRAIN COMPANY, Appellee, v. COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANSAT-LANTIQUE,

Appellant.

No. 273.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 7, 1928.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Joseph P. Nolan and Frank T. Hendl, both of New York City, for appellant.

Russell T. Mount and Duncan Mount, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree (26 F.[2d] 739) affirmed.