Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

PAYNE v. UNITED STATES, 24 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1928)

A. PAYNE, Plaintiff in Error, v. United States., 24 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1928)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1928-01-24
Topic: general

PAYNE v. UNITED STATES, 24 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1928) A. PAYNE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES of America. No. 7818.Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PAYNE v. UNITED STATES, 24 F.2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1928). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PAYNE v. UNITED STATES,24 F.2d 1020(8th Cir. 1928)

A. PAYNE, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 7818.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

January 24, 1928.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma.

Orban Patterson, of Oklahoma City, Okla., for plaintiff in error.

Roy St. Lewis, U.S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Okla., for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed without costs to either party in this court, on confession of error by defendant in error, and remanded with directions to grant a new trial.