Opinion · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Braunfeld v. Gibbons

184 F. Supp. 352

Type
Opinion
Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
1959-12-16
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This cause having been submitted on the Amended Complaint and defendants’ motion to dismiss that complaint; and this court finding itself in full accord with the reasoning and conclusions of another statutory court of this district in Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley, No. 25626, D.C.1959, 179 F.Supp. 944, concerning the constitutionality of Pennsylvania Act No. 212, 18 P.S. § 4699.10, approved August 10, 1959, prohibiting retail selling of enumerated commodities on Sunday; and the court finding nothing in the Amended Complaint herein to make the legal ruling in the aforesaid case No. 25626 inapplicable; it is this 16th day of December, 1959, Ordered that the complaint herein seeking a permanent injunction against the enforcement of Pennsylvania Act No. 212, approved August 10, 1959, be and it is hereby dismissed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Braunfeld v. Gibbons. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
PER CURIAM.

This cause having been submitted on the Amended Complaint and defendants’ motion to dismiss that complaint; and this court finding itself in full accord with the reasoning and conclusions of another statutory court of this district in Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley, No. 25626, D.C.1959, 179 F.Supp. 944, concerning the constitutionality of Pennsylvania Act No. 212, 18 P.S. § 4699.10, approved August 10, 1959, prohibiting retail selling of enumerated commodities on Sunday; and the court finding nothing in the Amended Complaint herein to make the legal ruling in the aforesaid case No. 25626 inapplicable; it is this 16th day of December, 1959,

Ordered that the complaint herein seeking a permanent injunction against the enforcement of Pennsylvania Act No. 212, approved August 10, 1959, be and it is hereby dismissed.