Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris
686 F.3d 1121
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2012-07-25
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- upholding California law requiring police to collect DNA samples from all adult felony arrestees and citing the government’s four "key interests": "identifying arrestees, solving past crimes, preventing future crimes, and exonerating the innocent"
- deferring submission to en banc court pending the Supreme Court’s decision in King
- vacating panel opinion and ordering rehearing en banc
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judges Nguyen, Watford and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.