Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Lionel Ernest Tholmer v. James Rowland
990 F.2d 1260
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-03-31
- Topic
- general
990 F.2d 1260 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lionel Ernest THOLMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, et. al., Respondents-Appellees No. 91-16892. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 9, 1993.* Decided March 31, 1993.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lionel Ernest Tholmer v. James Rowland. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Lionel Ernest THOLMER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
James ROWLAND, et. al., Respondents-Appellees
No. 91-16892.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 9, 1993.*
Decided March 31, 1993.
Before CHOY, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The district court order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the well-written, well-reasoned memorandum of Findings and Recommendations adopted by the District Court.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4