Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

WILLIAM C. DE MILLE PRODUCTIONS v. C.I.R., 80 F.2d 1010 (9th Cir. 1936)

WILLIAM C. DE MILLE PRODUCTIONS, Inc., Petitioner & Cross-Respondent, v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent & Cross-Petitioner., 80 F.2d 1010 (9th Cir. 1936)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1936-01-07
Topic: general

WILLIAM C. DE MILLE PRODUCTIONS v. C.I.R., 80 F.2d 1010 (9th Cir. 1936) WILLIAM C. DE MILLE PRODUCTIONS, Inc., Petitioner and Cross-Respondent, v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent and Cross-Petitioner. No. 8083.Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed WILLIAM C. DE MILLE PRODUCTIONS v. C.I.R., 80 F.2d 1010 (9th Cir. 1936). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

WILLIAM C. DE MILLE PRODUCTIONS v. C.I.R.,80 F.2d 1010(9th Cir. 1936)

WILLIAM C. DE MILLE PRODUCTIONS, Inc., Petitioner and Cross-Respondent, v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent and Cross-Petitioner.

No. 8083.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 7, 1936.

On Petitions to Review a Decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Dexter Bingham for taxpayer.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., for commissioner.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered petitions to review herein dismissed; mandate forthwith.