Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co.

787 F.2d 462

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1985-11-19
Topic: bankruptcy

ORDER Upon a vote of the majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment 768 F.2d 1120 is withdrawn.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

ATONIO v. WARDS COVE PACKING COMPANY, INC.,787 F.2d 462(9th Cir. 1985)

FRANK ATONIO, EUGENE BACILG, RANDY DEL FIERRO, CLARKE KIDO, LESTER KURAMOTO,

ALAN LEW, CURTIS LEW, ROBERT MOORIS, JOAQUIN ARRUIZA, BARBARA VIERUES, AS

ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF GENE ALLEN VIERNES, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WARDS COVE PACKING COMPANY, INC., CASTLE

COOKE, INC., AND COLUMBIA WARDS FISHERIES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

Nos. 83-1263, 84-3527.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 19, 1985.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

[1]ORDER

[2] Upon a vote of the majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment768 F.2d 1120is withdrawn.Page 463