Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.

785 F.2d 896

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1986-03-14
Topic: general

BY THE COURT: A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral *897argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

STEWART ORGANIZATION, INC., v. RICOH CORP.,785 F.2d 896(11th Cir. 1986)

THE STEWART ORGANIZATION, INC., A CORPORATION; WALTER H. STEWART, AND JAMES

S. SNOW, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. RICOH CORPORATION, A CORPORATION,

RICOH OF AMERICA, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

No. 85-7231.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 14, 1986.

Ralph H. Yeilding, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Scott M. Phelps, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellants.

Joseph W. Letzer, Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman, Burr Murray, Janet L. Humphreys, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

[2] (Opinion January 10, 1986, 11th Cir., 1986,779 F.2d 643)

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges and TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge.^fn*

BY THE COURT:

[3] A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[4] IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en bancwithoralPage 897argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

[5] The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Senior Circuit Judge Elbert P. Tuttle has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 46(c). ↩