Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Darden v. Wainwright
Darden v. Wainwright, 708 F.2d 646 (11th Cir. 1983)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-07-01
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM: Because the court is equally divided as to whether to affirm or reverse, the judgment of the district court, 513 F.Supp. 947, is AFFIRMED by operation of law.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Darden v. Wainwright. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
DARDEN v. WAINWRIGHT,708 F.2d 646(11th Cir. 1983)
WILLIE JASPER DARDEN, PETITIONER, CROSS RESPONDENT v. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT,
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT, CROSS
PETITIONER.
No. 81-5590.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 1, 1983.
Opinion Vacated September 1, 1983.
See715 F.2d 502.
Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, Fla., for respondent, cross petitioner.
[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
[2] (Opinion February 14, 1983, 11 Cir., 1983,699 F.2d 1031)
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, and RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge.fn*
- Circuit Judge Joseph W. Hatchett, having recused himself, did not participate in this decision. Senior Circuit Judge Lewis R. Morgan elected to participate in this decision pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 46(c). ↩