Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Burns v. Estelle
598 F.2d 1016
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1979-06-21
- Topic
- estate-planning
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion April 11, 1979, 5 Cir., 1979, 592 F.2d 1297). Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GOD-BOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Burns v. Estelle. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Joel Berger, New York City Legal Defense Fund and Educational Fund, Inc., NAACP, amicus curiae.
Anita Ashton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondents-appellees.
[4] IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.Page 1349