Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States v. Donato

United States v. Donato, 379 F.2d 288 (3d Cir. 1967)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-05-09
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • Government regulation notified employees that lockers in the United States Mint were not to be viewed by employees as private lockers
  • warrantless search of U.S. Mint employee’s locker upheld where government regulation provided Mint lockers not private

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Donato. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
UNITED STATES v. DONATO,379 F.2d 288(3rd Cir. 1967)
UNITED STATES of America, v. Joseph DONATO, Appellant.
No. 16369.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1967.
Decided May 9, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Francis L. Van Dusen, Judge.
Herman Bloom, Philadelphia, Pa. (Herbert Fisher, Bloom, Ocks Fisher, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Robert St. Leger Goggin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J.T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Harold S. O'Brian, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges, and NEALON, District Judge.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
On review of this record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court,269 F. Supp. 921, will be affirmed upon the opinions of Judge Van Dusen therein.