Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

CITY NATL. BK. OF COUNCIL BLUFFS v. C.I.R., 35 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir. 1929)

CITY Nat’l BANK OF COUNCIL BLUFFS, Iowa, Appellant, v. Comm’r OFINTERNAL REVENUE., 35 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir. 1929)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1929-06-28
Topic: general

CITY NATL. BK. OF COUNCIL BLUFFS v. C.I.R., 35 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir. 1929) CITY NATIONAL BANK OF COUNCIL BLUFFS, Iowa, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OFINTERNAL REVENUE.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CITY NATL. BK. OF COUNCIL BLUFFS v. C.I.R., 35 F.2d 1016 (8th Cir. 1929). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CITY NATL. BK. OF COUNCIL BLUFFS v. C.I.R.,35 F.2d 1016(8th Cir. 1929)

CITY NATIONAL BANK OF COUNCIL BLUFFS, Iowa, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF

INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 8639.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

June 28, 1929.

Petition to Review Decision of United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Daniel T. Sullivan, of Council Bluffs, Iowa, for appellant.

Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C.M. Charest, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petition to review order of Board of Tax Appeals dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of appellee and certificate of clerk of Board of Tax Appeals.Page 1017