Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Valentine v. South Coast Corp.

334 F.2d 244

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1964-07-20
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: The district court has, in our belief, fully covered and properly decided the controversy presented by this appeal. Valentine v. South Coast Corporation, D. C., 218 F.Supp. 148. Its judgment is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Valentine v. South Coast Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

VALENTINE v. SOUTH COAST CORPORATION,334 F.2d 244(5th Cir. 1964)

Walter VALENTINE, Appellant, v. The SOUTH COAST CORPORATION et al.,

Appellees.

No. 21069.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 20, 1964.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, E. Gordon West, Judge.

Jack C. Benjamin, Kierr Gainsburgh, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Harry McCall, Jr., Chaffe, McCall, Phillips, Burke, Toler Hopkins, New Orleans, La., for appellee. William K. Christovich, Christovich Kearney, New Orleans, La., for The South Coast Corp., appellee.

Before RIVES and JONES, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The district court has, in our belief, fully covered and properly decided the controversy presented by this appeal. Valentine v. South Coast Corporation, D.C.,218 F. Supp. 148. Its judgment is affirmed.Page 245Page 262