Opinion · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Boomhower, Inc. v. Boomhower

243 F.2d 254

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1957-04-18
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Appellant’s principal contention is that the District Court’s findings are not supported by the evidence. We find no basis for this contention. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Boomhower, Inc. v. Boomhower. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 10 opinions

BOOMHOWER v. BOOMHOWER,243 F.2d 254(D.C. Cir. 1957)

BOOMHOWER, Inc., a corporation, Appellant. v. D.W. BOOMHOWER, Appellee.

No. 13518.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 27, 1957.

Decided April 18, 1957.

Petition for Rehearing Denied May 10, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Matthew F. McGuire, District Judge.

Mr. Thaddeus G. Benton, New York City, with whom Mr. Russell Hardy, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Joseph C. Turco, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and BAZELON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's principal contention is that the District Court's findings are not supported by the evidence. We find no basis for this contention.

Affirmed.