Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Costello

United States v. Costello, 239 F.2d 177 (2d Cir. 1956)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1956-12-12
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Appeal from denial of a motion to correct a sentence imposed under 26 U.S. C.A. § 145(b). On the authority of United States v. Moran, 2 Cir., 236 F. 2d 361, certiorari denied November 13, 1956, 77 S.Ct. 148, the order is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Costello. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. COSTELLO,239 F.2d 177(2nd Cir. 1956)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Frank COSTELLO,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 183, Docket 24333.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Submitted December 10, 1956.
Decided December 12, 1956.
Hays, St. John, Abramson Heilbron, Delaney Donoghue, New York City, for appellant; Osmond K. Fraenkel, Morris Shilensky, Joseph Leary Delaney, New York City, and Jacob Kossman, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.

Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., New York City, for appellee; Arthur H. Christy, Robert Kirtland and William K. Zinke, Asst. U.S. Attys., New York City, of counsel.
Before SWAN, MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from denial of a motion to correct a sentence imposed under 26 U.S.C.A. § 145(b). On the authority of United States v. Moran, 2 Cir.,236 F.2d 361, certiorari denied November 13, 1956, 77 S.Ct. 148, the order is affirmed.Page 178