Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Costello

239 F.2d 177

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1956-12-12
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Appeal from denial of a motion to correct a sentence imposed under 26 U.S. C.A. § 145(b). On the authority of United States v. Moran, 2 Cir., 236 F. 2d 361, certiorari denied November 13, 1956, 77 S.Ct. 148, the order is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Costello. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. COSTELLO,239 F.2d 177(2nd Cir. 1956)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Frank COSTELLO,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 183, Docket 24333.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Submitted December 10, 1956.
Decided December 12, 1956.
Hays, St. John, Abramson Heilbron, Delaney Donoghue, New York City, for appellant; Osmond K. Fraenkel, Morris Shilensky, Joseph Leary Delaney, New York City, and Jacob Kossman, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.

Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., New York City, for appellee; Arthur H. Christy, Robert Kirtland and William K. Zinke, Asst. U.S. Attys., New York City, of counsel.
Before SWAN, MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from denial of a motion to correct a sentence imposed under 26 U.S.C.A. § 145(b). On the authority of United States v. Moran, 2 Cir.,236 F.2d 361, certiorari denied November 13, 1956, 77 S.Ct. 148, the order is affirmed.Page 178