Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Conley v. Gibson

Conley v. Gibson, 229 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1956)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1956-01-31
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Slocomb v. Delaware, L. & W. R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Conley v. Gibson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

CONLEY v. GIBSON,229 F.2d 436(5th Cir. 1956)

J.D. CONLEY, Stanley Moore, Sr., George L. Carter, and B.A. Watson,

Appellants, v. Pat J. GIBSON, General Chairman of Locals 6051 and 28 et

al., Appellees.

No. 15566.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 31, 1956.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1956.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Thomas M. Kennerly, Judge.

Roberson L. King, Houston, Tex., Dent, Ford, King Wickliff, Houston, Tex., for appellants.

Edward J. Hickey, Jr., Washington, D.C., Chester M. Fulton, L.G. Clinton, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., Mulholland, Robie Hickey, Washington, D.C., of counsel, for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RIVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Slocomb v. Delaware, L. W.R. Co.,339 U.S. 239,70 S.Ct. 577,94 L.Ed. 795; Hettenbaugh v. Airline Pilots Ass'n, 5 Cir.,189 F.2d 319.Page 437